EMANCIPATION – It was simply never true!
It was around 2015 that some vigilante-minded individuals in South Africa, most of them infused with knowledge of the American UCC Code arguments, started to convince their peers that the achieving of sovereignty status will “emancipate” one from one’s government of the day, and that it is the in-“thing to do” in order to loosen, separate and credential oneself to act, at will, either in the “private” as a sovereign person, or to act in the “public” as a legal entity, with such legal entity called one’s birth certificate.
The goal was to have as many people “emancipated” as sovereigns so that such sovereigns would become (having the status of being) untouchable in the civil courts, and even to a certain extent, in criminal courts. Many people in South Africa paid exorbitant amounts of money who had believed then, that they’d be liberated from a “corrupt” system called the “cabal” (of government).
And it turned out to be just not true…
Emancipation has one reference – one meaning only – in South African Legislation, and even so, in every other country’s legislation, including the “vigilant” United States of America. The only emancipation order that can ever be issued by any authority like a court of law, is an order in which a child at or under the age of 16 is declared emancipated from his/her parents or adult caregivers. And mostly such emancipation orders are thus issued based on evidence of self-sufficiency and self-sustaining, for the purposes of being economically viable within a society / country. Acquiescence, as claimed by the protagonists of “emancipation”, has absolutely nothing to do with it. What needs to be understood very clearly, whether we like it or not, no government has to agree or comment on anything to- and in which it has no interest. If it remains mute on an aspect, it does not at all mean that it acquiesced to whatever an individual had told it, in writing.
What most of the “emancipation”/sovereign protagonists held as a huge carrot was that it will “elevate” (much favoured, famous & fathomed English word in the American culture) one “above” the law (civil and some criminal legislation). What they had forgotten about was that mankind stands under “thou shalt not kill / steal / bear false witness…” etc., in other words DO NO HARM & live in PEACE with one another. No one whosoever on Earth is exempt from it. No living being on Earth is elevated from such laws – they are real laws, in force today, in this very moment, like the law of Gravity and the law of Cause and Effect.
But it does not end there: there cannot possibly be any emancipation from the law of DO NO HARM, as it is common knowledge in any event, that we have to work towards a harmlessness around us as a success, and success occurs with the throughput of wisdom & the development of the achievement, during a period of time. It is not and cannot ever be achieved by fiat.
To add: we all know that when we start to look at things differently, the things we look at, will change. We all know too, that the acquisition of wisdom (clever and astute thinking) requires the exertion of skill and requires to apply “skill” as a verb too.
Thus, apart from “do no harm”, we have the universal duty to skill for the benefits of others, and to bring positive changes into lives, for the greater good of all. No one on Earth is exempt either, from the duty of skilling.
The conclusion is that emancipation is the start for every individual to enter a world of responsible thinking and conduct (to skill), by doing no harm, which includes this skilling act, for the greater good of all. The point is: it can never be the end of (such) a road, as there is no end of such road, it always calls for a new beginning. To be felt & perceived as, or to pretend to be aloft to the law of “do no harm” and the duty to “skill” renders one a vagabond, meaning nothing to society, a leech.
So, what is the truth then?
It is NOT to be “emancipated” from a government’s laws that consummates one’s own sovereignty. The focus has been on the wrong thing all along – it is all about using the current National Legislation of the country, especially the financial laws and the Court Rules (of the Magistrates’ Courts and High Courts) through the tools of investigative research and astute thinking, that will make one realise that one should have a change of status effectively communicated in the Court, pertaining to the matter at hand, at that point in time, based on the merits of that matter, and the financial legislation (or lack thereof) which is or is not applicable on the merits of the matter at hand.
It is about DEMONSTRATING one’s status as a sovereign, through PROBABLE EVIDENCE at a place and at a time when it matters most, to achieve liberation from any civil claim ON PUBLIC RECORD, as & when they come along. It is not a walk in the park exercise of completing a few once-off documents to be mailed to the State President, the Judge President, and different government departments, in the comfort of your own home, via “service by email” by virtue of the “emancipation” behind it. That is, was & has always been wishful thinking. But it takes energy, wisdom, application of mind, collaboration, working in a team, sound human relationships being flanged along the way, focusing on the matter at hand, and argue the merits and using the merits of the case in arguments in an astute, confident manner. It takes studying, researching, planning….in other words: WORK for it – not email it.
Emancipation is a farce and was an “email dance” in some people’s own comfort zones / homes and has always only been exactly that. It was a moneymaking racket that is busy crashing down (good riddance), and it is actually so sad that so many people have been duped.
Forensically, the act and “procedure” of emancipation do not and cannot ever make sense. Emancipation is asked for, and then once it was approved, it gets issued as an order in favour of a (minor) child, for whatever the reasons have been, for asking such order. It marks the beginning of something that was changed, in order to continue in that changed way, for the benefit of someone. The way it was purported to South Africans of late, was to do so for the purposes of ending something as a change to something, and as we all know, only death has that finality imposed on anyone.
Whether one is emancipated or not, one is still sovereign. As and when situations come up, one manages and communicates one’s sovereignty at the appropriate forums, in appropriate ways, for specific purposes.
The possibilities and opportunities for demonstrating once actual status as sovereign thru probable evidence in a court of law are endless. The system is bereft, not only with the proverbial “loopholes” but also with irresponsible & ridiculous omissions, wilfully omitted & hidden, a truly corrupt system indeed. (As it was clearly discovered in the case of the (hidden) legislation-piece: Regulation 32 of the National Credit Act). And the courts, once made aware of one’s prowess & astute knowledge of the court system, and of the knowledge of the securitization processes of creditors under the Financial Markets Act, the courts do NOT have a choice but to give credence to- and respect the arguments of any defendant, even if such defendant is a mere perceived layman.
The shortcomings of the court system, together with its wilful tendency to “shy away” from the real truth of what a court of law actually is and stands for, are exactly those shortcomings & “shyness to address” that are being used against the system with huge success. Those shortcomings are being exploited more & more, laid bare more & more, and are being exposed more & more, and the system cookie is crumbling – fact. One cannot operate in an evil set-up and pretend that one is transparent. It is simply impossible to do. When authority stands for something that causes harm, it has to cover it up as legit, with a mandatory lie. Such authority will soon end up issuing explanations instead of orders.
To use emancipation from government as one’s defence in court, will result in exactly the same way as that of the farmer who had told the judge on the 1st of March 2024 at the Mahikeng High Court in the North West province that “I am emancipated and….” He did not even finish his sentence, as the judge told him to keep quiet and sit down. A short while later, the farm of the farmer was sold out from under him by means of a court order in favour of the bank.
If one wants to extinguish a fire, one would in almost all cases use water. Well, “emancipation” is fuel on the fire in a court of law – truly. The false emancipation procedures that have been infused as an “education” of late, can tragically have far-reaching effects on those who had “emancipated”. It will in actual fact be an aggravating circumstance against such “emancipated” defendants in court.
The caveat though, too: whatever was sent via email or post to the government to have the government be notified as cognizant of one’s “emancipation”, can later on be used by the government against such a citizen, when such citizen would approach government for help, such as at a clinic, or the Department of Labour, or CCMA, or the Labour Court, or the Home Affairs Department or Welfare Department, etc. I mention this because nothing in national legislation of the country prevents government to use those documents as and when it suits it (the government) against someone, for the benefit of the government, but to the detriment of the citizen who has “emancipated”.